Earlier this week the Supreme Court declined to hear the matter of Doe v. Facebook wherein the Plaintiff was accusing Facebook of being liable for the injuries she received after being lured into a trap by a sexual predator, beaten, abused, and raped. Justice Thomas issued a dissental echoing another opinion he penned earlier this year calling for the Supreme Court to reconsider the scope of immunity offered to social media company under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in anappropriate case [
Share this post
Justice Thomas On Social Media Immunity
Share this post
Earlier this week the Supreme Court declined to hear the matter of Doe v. Facebook wherein the Plaintiff was accusing Facebook of being liable for the injuries she received after being lured into a trap by a sexual predator, beaten, abused, and raped. Justice Thomas issued a dissental echoing another opinion he penned earlier this year calling for the Supreme Court to reconsider the scope of immunity offered to social media company under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in anappropriate case [